Skip to content

Linq to SQL => far from dead

There are quite a few developers that believe that Linq to SQL is dead in favor of EF. That’s not the case though and I have the facts to prove it. Here’s the list of changes that are coming with the next .net framework, .Net 4.0.

Performance
  • Query plans are reused more often by specifically defining text parameter lengths (when connecting to SQL 2005 or later)
  • Identity cache lookups for primary key with single result now includes query.Where(predicate).Single/SingleOrDefault/First/FirstOrDefault
  • Reduced query execution overhead when DataLoadOptions specified (cache lookup considers DataLoadOptions value equivalency)
Usability
  • ITable<T> interface for additional mocking possibilities
  • Contains with enums automatically casts to int or string depending on column type
  • Associations can now specify non-primary-key columns on the other end of the association for updates
  • Support list initialization syntax for queries
  • LinqDataSource now supports inherited entities
  • LinqDataSource support for ASP.NET query extenders added
Query stability
  • Contains now detects self-referencing IQueryable and doesn’t cause a stack overflow
  • Skip(0) no longer prevents eager loading
  • GetCommand operates within SQL Compact transactions
  • Exposing Link<T> on a property/field is detected and reported correctly
  • Compiled queries now correctly detect a change in mapping source and throw
  • String.StartsWith, EndsWith and Contains now correctly handles ~ in the search string (regular & compiled queries)
  • Now detects multiple active result sets (MARS) better
  • Associations are properly created between entities when using eager loading with Table-Valued Functions (TVFs)
  • Queries that contain sub-queries with scalar projections now work better
Update stability
  • SubmitChanges no longer silently consumes transaction rollback exceptions
  • SubmitChanges deals with timestamps in a change conflict scenario properly
  • IsDbGenerated now honors renamed properties that don’t match underlying column name
  • Server-generated columns and SQL replication/triggers now work instead of throwing SQL exception
  • Improved binding support with the MVC model binder
General stability
  • Binary types equate correctly after deserialization
  • EntitySet.ListChanged fired when adding items to an unloaded entity set
  • Dispose our connections upon context disposal (ones passed in are untouched)
Database  control
  • DeleteDatabase no longer fails with case-sensitive database servers
SQL Metal
  • Foreign key property setter now checks all affected associations not just the first
  • Improved error handling when primary key type not supported
  • Now skips stored procedures containing table-valued parameters instead of aborting process
  • Can now be used against connections that use AttachDbFilename syntax
  • No longer crashes when unexpected data types are encountered
LINQ to SQL class designer
  • Now handles a single anonymously named column in SQL result set
  • Improved error message for associations to nullable unique columns
  • No longer fails when using clauses are added to the partial user class
  • VarChar(1) now correctly maps to string and not char
  • Decimal precision and scale are now emitted correctly in the DbType attributes for stored procedures & computed columns
  • Foreign key changes will be picked up when bringing tables back into the designer without a restart
  • Can edit the return value type of unidentified stored procedure types
  • Stored procedure generated classes do not localize the word “Result” in the class name
  • Opening a DBML file no longer causes it to be checked out of source control
  • Changing a FK for a table and re-dragging it to the designer surface will show new FK’s
Code generation (SQL Metal + LINQ to SQL class designer)
  • Stored procedures using original values now compiles when the entity and context namespaces differ
  • Virtual internal now generates correct syntax
  • Mapping attributes are now fully qualified to prevent conflicts with user types
  • KnownTypeAttributes are now emitted for DataContractSerializer with inheritance
  • Delay-loaded foreign keys now have the correct, compilable, code generated
  • Using stored procedures with concurrency no longer gets confused if entities in different namespace to context
  • ForeignKeyReferenceAlreadyHasValueException is now thrown if any association is loaded not just the first
Potentially breaking changes

We worked very hard to avoid breaking changes but of course any potential bug fix is a breaking change if your application was depending on the wrong behavior. The ones I specifically want to call out are:

Skip(0) is no longer a no-op

The special-casing of 0 for Skip to be a no-op was causing some subtle issues such as eager loading to fail and we took the decision to stop special casing this. This means if you had syntax that was invalid for a Skip greater than 0 it will now also be invalid for skip with a 0. This makes more sense and means your app would break on the first page now instead of subtlety breaking on the second page. Fail fast 🙂

ForeignKeyReferenceAlreadyHasValue exception

If you are getting this exception where you weren’t previously it means you have an underlying foreign key with multiple associations based on it and you are trying to change the underlying foreign key even though we have associations loaded.Best thing to do here is to set the associations themselves and if you can’t do that make sure they aren’t loaded when you want to set the foreign key to avoid inconsistencies.

Published inLinq to SQL

2 Comments

  1. I was always saying that even if Linq to Sql is to be depricated there would still be enhancements in future releases. The same thing is happending with datasets all this time.
    However I see more improvements than what I expected to see. And I really understand why? I don”t have real experience with Linq2Sql since I”m always using Entity Framework instead. I don”t see the purpose of having too so similar data access frameworks by the same company (Microsoft).

  2. I”m always in favor of the concept “The right tool for the right job” having said that the more tools I have, the more the chances to find the right one for a specific need, be it DataSets, LinqToSQL, EF or even third party ones like Subsonic and NHibernate.
    And I can tell you, although LinqToSQL and EF share some concepts they are far from similar.

Leave a Reply to Dimitris Papadimitriou Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.